Visit by Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer
Jan Fischer was born in Prague in 1951 to a family of mathematical statisticians and actuarial mathematicians. His father was a scientific employee of the Mathematics Institute of the Czech Academy of Science and devoted himself to statistical applications in genetics, breeding and medicine.
Fischer finished his studies at the national economics faculty of the University of Economics, Prague with a degree in statistics and econometrics in 1974. He joined the statistical office after university, where he worked until the beginning of the 1980s as a research employee of the Research Institute of Socioeconomic Information (then a part of the statistics office). In 1985, he finished his post-graduate studies at the Prague School of Economics and gained the title of Candidate of Science in the field of economic statistics. He served in various functions at the Federal Statistical Office until 1990, when he became deputy chairman of the office. After the creation of an independent Czech Republic in 1993, he became the deputy chairman of the Czech Statistical Office.
From the beginning of the 1990s he led teams processing the results of parliamentary and municipal elections. He was also in charge of contacts with the European Union's Eurostat statistical office. In the spring of 2001, he worked on a mission of the International Monetary Fund which examined the possibility of building statistical services in East Timor.
From September 2000 he worked as the director of the production department for the Taylor Nelson Sofres Factum company, and from March 2002 until his naming as chairman of the Czech Statistical Office, he was the head of the research facilities of the Faculty of Informatics and Statistics of the Prague School of Economics.
He was named chairman of the Czech Statistical Office by the President of the Czech Republic on 24 April 2003.
He was named Prime Minister by the President of the Czech Republic on 9 April 2009.
He is a member of a number of prestigious institutions, including the Czech Statistics Society, the International Statistics Institute, the Science Council, the Board of Trustees of the University of Economics, Prague, as well as the Science Council of the University of J.E. Purkyně in Ústí nad Labem.
Jan Fischer is married for the second time and is the father of three children.
Ideas of Secularization in Trans-Atlantic Perspectives
This workshop will address different ideas of secularization, the ways they have been historically narrated, and now function discursively, and how these insights may help us address the subject’s present day politicization. Workshop sessions will especially focus on the different approaches to secularization in the US and Europe.
In cultural, sociological, and geopolitical realms, religion and religiosity have become central issues in the contemporary world. This centrality raises questions about associating modernity with the secular, and also about what we mean by ‘secularism’ or ‘secularization.’ These concepts have been used variously to designate the progressive disappearance of religion and also its transformation into modern institutions, and connoting both emancipation and a nostalgia for lost origins. Today, this ambiguity is less an obstacle than a promise for future theory, since it encourages a promising debate about the modern and its relation towards religion.
Concepts of secularization appear to follow distinct perspectives: While an American debate focuses on the political issue of secularism and on sociological approaches, in Europe the concept is rather related to philosophy and cultural history. Both perspectives should be understood as interrelated and each responds to different historical and contemporary roles of religion in Europe and America, and raises important political questions. The 'neutrality' of the state toward religion, for example, as seen from a juridical or a historical perspective, has different meanings in the U.S. and Europe. No less important are the relations of Europe and the U.S. towards Islam in particular.
The present workshop aims to develop understandings of secularization that will be productive for cultural, political, and legal applications. Beyond a unified theory, secularization may be understood as a discursive construct, and as a series of figurative ideas: including metaphors such as the ‘death of God’ or modern ‘disenchantment,’ topoi such as Mysticism, Nihilism or the Vera Icon, and narratives such as the Weber-Thesis or the afterlife of antiquity. This workshop is intended to facilitate analysis of historical and contemporary issues including: Can ideas of secularization contribute to a fruitful analysis of the relation between religion and modernity? In what ways are secularism and faith integral to modern and postmodern thought? How can we put into productive debate American and the European approaches towards secularization? Does the idea of secularization necessarily cast theological communities as anti-modern?
WORKSHOP SCHEDULE
June 3
9:30am: Breakfast
10:00am: Welcome and Workshop Introduction, Daniel Weidner
I. (Secularization in Question) 10:15am – 11:45am
- Adrian Pabst, "The Paradox of Faith – Religion beyond secularization and de-secularization"
- Jean Claude Monod, "Has the concept of 'Secularization' lost any relevance?"
Lunch break 12:00pm-1:00pm
II (Rhetorics and Politics of Secularization) 1:00pm-2:30pm
- Daniel Weidner, " ‘Secularization’ as Metaphor, Myth, and Allegory"
- Christopher Soper, "Clothing the Naked Public Square: Religion, Secularism, and the Future of Politics"
Break: 2:30pm-3:00pm
III (Case studies) 3:00pm-4:30pm
- David Myers, "Reflections on the 'Deprivatization' of Religion: Lessons Learned from Kiryas Joel, New York"
- Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, "Disestablishment, American Style"
Day 1 summary remarks 4:30pm-5:00pm
Dinner
June 4
8:30am Breakfast, with day 2 opening remarks by Daniel Weidner
IV (Secularization in between) 9:00am-10:30am
- John McCole, "Between disenchantment and the post-secular: Georg Simmel on religion"
- Brian Britt, "Secular Reading, Religious Writing: Benjamin and Freud on Schreber"
Break
10:30-10:45am
V (Secularization and Literature) 10:45am-12:15pm
- Christian Sieg , "Between the Religious and the Secular. Heinrich Böll’s Early Oeuvre in the Context of the Secularization Debate"
- Russell Berman, "Konrad Weiss and the 'Christian Epimetheus' -- Secularization and the Weimar Crisis"
Lunch break 12:15pm-1:30pm
VI (Temporalities sacred and secular) 1:30pm-3:00pm
- Andrea Schatz, "Irresistible Secularism? Time, Language and the Jewish Enlightenment"
- Nitzan Lebovic, "Hannah Arendt and Extraordinary Secularism"
Workshop concluding remarks (Weidner) with concluding discussion 3:00pm-4:00pm.
Board Room
Stanford Humanities Center
Russell A. Berman
Department of Comparative Literature
Stanford University
Building 260, Room 201
Stanford, CA 94305-2030
Russell Berman is the Walter A. Haas Professor in the Humanities at Stanford and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution where he co-directs the Working Group on Islamism and the International Order. He holds a courtesy appointment at the Freeman Spogli Institute. He formerly served as Senior Advisor on the Policy Planning Staff of the United States Department of State and has been awarded a Mellon Faculty Fellowship at Harvard and an Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship for research in Berlin; he has also been honored with the Bundesverdienstkreuz of the Federal Republic of Germany.
His books include The Rise of the Modern German Novel: Crisis and Charisma (1988) and Enlightenment or Empire: Colonial Discourse in German Culture (1998), both of which won the Outstanding Book Award of the German Studies Association. Some of his other books include Anti-Americanism in Europe: A Cultural Problem (2004), Fiction Sets You Free: Literature, Liberty and Western Culture (2007) and Freedom or Terror: Europe Faces Jihad (2010). In his books and many articles Berman has written widely on the cultural history of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, critical theory, and cultural dimensions of trans-Atlantic relations, as well as on topics between Europe and the Middle East. His commentary on current events has appeared in The New Republic, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Times Internationale Politik, Telos, Daily Beast, the Los Angeles Review Books, die Welt, die Neue Zuercher Zeitung, die Weltwoche, and American Greatness and elsewhere.
At the Crossroads of Modernization: China and Russia
AGENDA
8:50-9:00 Welcome Remarks by Christer Prusiainen and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss
9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. "Political Transformation in Russia"
Chair: Linda Jakobson, Senior Fellow, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Paper Presenter: Christer Pursiainen, the Council on Baltic States
Discussant: Dr. Kathryn Stoner-Weiss, Deputy Director, CDDRL, Stanford University
10:00-11:00 a.m. "Political Transformation in China"
Chair: Linda Jakobson, Senior Fellow, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Paper Presenter: Minxin Pei, Professor of Government, Claremont McKenna College
Discussant: Kevin O'Brien, Professor of Political Science, University of California, Berkley
11:00-11:15 a.m. Coffee Break
11:15 a.m. -12:15 p.m. "Chinese Foreign Policy in the New Era"
Chair: Christer Pursiainen, the Council on Baltic States
Paper Presenter: Sergei Medvedev, Professor, Moscow Higher School of Economics
Discussant: Steven Fish, Professor of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley
12:15-13:15 p.m. Lunch (Outside the Conference Room)
13:15-14:15: "Russia Foreign Policy in the New Era"
Chair: Christer Pursiainen, the Council on Baltic States
Paper Presenter: Linda Jakobson, Senior Fellow, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Discussant: Tom Fingar, Oksenberg/Rohlen Distinguished Fellow, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University
14:15-15:15 p.m. "Social Stratification in China since Reform"
Chair: Minxin Pei, Professor Claremont McKenna College
Paper Presenter: Dr. Li Chunling, Professor, Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Discussant: Andrew Walder, Denise O'Leary and Kent Thiry Professor of Sociology, Stanford University
15:15-15:30 p.m. Coffee Break
15:30-16:30 p.m. "Social Stratification in Russia"
Chair: Minxin Pei, Professor, Claremont McKenna College
Reuben W. Hills Conference Room
Taiwan's Changing Political Landscape and Prospects for the 2012 Presidential Election
The question of whether President Ma Ying-jeou will be reelected has already become a hot issue in Taiwan, two years in advance of the next presidential election. In this special seminar, Professor Ying-lung You, a political scientist and one of the most prominent political strategists in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), will analyze the current political and electoral landscape of Taiwan and the possible future trends. Whereas some may argue that the question of Ma’s reelection is a question mark only for those who oppose him, Professor You argues that the reality is rather different. This is particularly so after the ruling KMT party has encountered five consecutive setbacks in the recent elections. In this seminar, Professor You will provide firsthand information about the recent election campaigns in Taiwan. By carefully examining Taiwan’s shifting political landscape, he will give us his prediction about the prospects of both the DPP and the KMT in the 2012 presidential election.
Dr. Ying-lung You received his B.A. and M.A. from National Taiwan University, and his Ph.D. in political science from University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. In 1995-96, he was executive director of Election Strategy and Campaigning for the DPP. In 1999, he directed election strategy and public opinion polls in the campaign headquarters of then former Taipei City major Chen Shui-Bian, who later won the presidential election in March 2000. In 2000-01, he served as vice-chairman of the Research, Development, and Evaluation Commission of the Executive Yuan. In 2002-03, he served as Deputy Secretary General for the DPP and in 2003-05 as Vice President of the Katagalan Institute. From 2005 to 2008, he served as the vice chairman of the Mainland Affairs Commission of the Executive Yuan and concurrently served as vice Chairman and secretary-general of the Strait Exchanges Foundation, through which positions he was mainly responsible for Taiwan’s Cross-Strait policy making under the DPP administration. His research interests are public opinion, voting behavior, democratization, constitutional choices, and cross-strait relations. He is the author/editor of 4 books and more than 20 scholarly articles.
Philippines Conference Room
Firoze Manji on challenges using new media to support social justice movements in Africa
Firoze Manji is founding Executive Director of Fahamu - Networks for Social Justice, a pan African organization with offices in Kenya, Senegal, South Africa and the UK.
Fahamu exists to support the development and growth of a powerful social justice movement in Africa. There are three core areas of activity:
Training: Fahamu aims to strengthen human rights organizations by providing training programs that include sufficient pre workshop preparation and post workshop follow-up to ensure substantive learning. Fahamu has created CD-ROM based training packages covering subjects from advocacy to financial management to gender violence and conflict.
News & Media: Pambazuka News is a weekly electronic newsletter providing commentary and analysis on issues of social justice across Africa, published in English, French and Portuguese. There are 26,000 subscribers and half a million unique visitors to the site. Content is also published on allafrica.com and it is widely used by mainstream media. Pambazuka was one of the first African organizations to use podcasts and videocasts.
Advocacy: Fahamu was heavily involved in efforts to persuade countries to sign up to the African Union's Rights of Women in Africa Protocol. The organization attracted a great deal of attention for its strategy of getting people to sign a petition via cell phones. Within 18 months it had persuaded the necessary 15 countries to ratify the Protocol.
Firoze shared a number of his insights from his experience using ICTs in these areas:
There remain real barriers to use of ICTs in Africa: Middle class Africans often have more than one cell phone each; penetration figures can therefore be misleading. The cost associated with text and especially voice services is prohibitive for many. While email is cheap, web surfing is expensive and due to low bandwidth, painfully slow.
Paper formats are in some instances still the most useful: Feedback from students on Fahamu courses has shown consistent demand for paper resources. Students rarely have their own home computer or laptop and they may travel often; internet cafes can be unsafe environments for women alone. For these reasons, Fahamu continues to produce print resources. It also recently launched Pambazuka Press to promote African writers. Books will be sold at cost to distributors in Africa and at commercial rates elsewhere.
Technology tools are a complement to, not substitute for real engagement: Analysis of the Rights of Women Protocol petition showed that less than 10% of signatures had come via cell phones. It was the political legwork of going through the protocol in person with each individual that made the real difference to the outcome. This confirms Firoze's view that tools such as cell phones cannot create social change where there is no existing real-world network for them to tap into. We need to be wary of fetishizing technology tools, attributing to them powers they simply cannot have.
Technology, Froze argues, tends to reflect and amplify existing social relations. So while ICTs can enable people to voice their own experience in a way that was not available to them before, they can just as easily serve to shore up existing power structures.