-
Contesting Sharia Law and Moral Enforcement in Aceh, Indonesia: A Contextual Approach

This webinar will address the complexities and the unexpected outcomes of enforcing Sharia—Islamic law—through the machinery of inefficient statecraft in the Indonesian province of Aceh, which is located on the periphery of the world’s largest archipelagic nation. Of Indonesia’s 38 provinces, Aceh is the only one that has been granted the official right to implement Islamic law. Sharia promises to provide comprehensive guidance in all aspects of life.  Local authorities in Aceh have used the scope and force of the law to prohibit expression and criminalize conduct deemed to deviate from “Islamic ideals.” Movies, concerts, New Year’s Eve celebrations, punk and other “alternative” lifestyles were outlawed and seen as signs of calamity, moral disorder, and social disease. Yet the Sharia state’s efforts to limit the “acceptable” range of ways of being Muslim in Aceh are not impervious to opposition. Various forms of resistance to the everyday workings of state Sharia institutions have occurred. In the provincial capital, Banda Aceh, for example, several youth groups have creatively confronted government efforts to discipline them and control their space despite facing continuous harassment from Muslim hardliners and the Sharia Police. Beyond reviewing these conditions, Professor Idria’s analysis of the state enforcement of Islamic law on the periphery of a large country’s rapidly changing society will explore and explain how the implementation of Sharia in Aceh has both influenced and been shaped by broader contexts, political, economic, social, and cultural in character.

Image
Reza Idria 030223

Reza Idria is an Assistant Professor of Social Anthropology in the Ar-Raniry State Islamic University in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, where he chairs the Aceh Association of Oral Tradition.  He also serves in various scholarly and journalistic capacities and as a researcher in the International Center for Aceh and Indian Ocean Studies. His writings have appeared in journals and books and he has given talks and presented papers in Asia, Europe, and the United States.  His post-graduate degrees are from Leiden University (Islamic Studies, MA 2010) and Harvard (Social Anthropology, MA 2016 and PhD 2020)

Donald K. Emmerson

Via Zoom webinar http://bit.ly/3YtY7hd

0
Visiting Scholar at APARC, 2022-23
Lee Kong Chian NUS-Stanford Fellow on Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2022-23
idria_700x700.jpg Ph.D

Reza Idria joined the Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center (APARC) as Visiting Scholar and 2022-23 Lee Kong Chian NUS-Stanford Fellow on Contemporary Southeast Asia for the winter and spring quarter of 2023. Idria currently serves as Assistant Professor at the Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. While at APARC, he conducted research on the wide range of social and political responses that have emerged with the state implementation of Sharia (Islamic Law) in Indonesia.

Date Label
Reza Idria 2022-23 Lee Kong Chian NUS-Stanford Fellow on Contemporary Southeast Asia
Seminars
-
Event poster for Beyond ASEAN? Geopolitics, External Rivals, Internal Differences, and The State of Southeast Asia 2023

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) deserves credit for sustaining peaceful and consensual multilateral cooperation in a diverse and historically divided region.  Accordingly, in principle if not always in practice, outside powers have supported the regional centrality of ASEAN.  But what does that centrality mean and can it survive current challenges?  While still recovering from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Southeast Asia faces the destabilizing consequences of intense US-China tensions, Russia’s war in Ukraine, and global economic uncertainty.  Nor has ASEAN responded effectively to the ongoing domestic repression by the junta in Myanmar, one of the grouping’s own member countries.  Are there steps that ASEAN’s 2023 chair, Indonesia, could take to help meet these challenges?  Should minilateral options be considered?  In the context of addressing these and related topics, Sharon Seah will share pertinent findings from a just-published regional survey of Southeast Asian opinion influencers, The State of Southeast Asia 2023.

Image
Sharon Sheah 022723

Sharon Seah, in addition to her work for ISEAS-Yusof Ishak’s ASEAN Studies Centre, coordinates the Institute’s Climate Change in Southeast Asia Programme.  Her earlier service has included 15 years in Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and its National Environment Agency.  Among her research interests are ASEAN, multilateralism, climate change, and the rule of law.  Her publications include, as co-editor, Building a New Legal Order for the Oceans (2019) and 50 Years of ASEAN and Singapore (2017). She has also served as the lead author of ISEAS-Yusof Ishak’s survey reports, The State of Southeast Asia and The Southeast Asia Climate Outlook.  She holds a Master in Public and International Law from the University of Melbourne (2018

Donald K. Emmerson

Via Zoom webinar http://bit.ly/3RXaVdB

Sharon Seah Senior Fellow and Coordinator, ASEAN Studies Centre, ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute
Seminars
-
Eilidh Geddes is a Ph.D. candidate in Economics from Northwestern University. Her work focuses on health economics, industrial organization, and applied microeconomics with a focus on markets with price regulations. In her dissertation, she investigates community rating in health insurance markets where firms may change entry behavior in response to market-level price discrimination regulation. She additionally studies the supply side effects of health insurance expansions and the effects of rent control.

Eilidh Geddes Photo

 

 

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

Registration

 

Hybrid Seminar: Breakfast will be provided for on-campus participants. 
Please register if you plan to attend, both for in-person and via Zoom.

Log in on your computer, or join us in person: 
Encina Commons, Room 119 
615 Crothers Way 
Stanford, CA 94305

Seminars
-

About the Event: The talk will feature the 2022 volume, Living in a Nuclear World: From Fukushima to Hiroshima (Routledge), and its three co-editors, Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (U. Paris 1, Pantheon-Sorbonne), Soraya Boudia (U. Paris Cité), and Kyoko Sato (Stanford). The book provides unique post-Fukushima reflections on nuclear history and politics from a long-term and transnational perspective, asking how nuclear technology has shaped the world we live in and how we have come to live with it and the peril it presents. A product of sustained, multi-year and interdisciplinary intellectual exchange among scholars on nuclear technology from different disciplinary (e.g., history, anthropology, STS, philosophy, nuclear sciences) and national (e.g., US, Japan, France) backgrounds, the volume tackles the global nuclear history backwards: how Fukushima shed new light on past efforts to spread and control nuclear technology. Through examining the politics of knowledge, technical innovation, and narratives, as well as the development of international standards and governance frameworks, it explores how we have managed nuclear violence and disasters, envisioned a bright future with the nuclear technology, and trivialized and normalized threats from the nuclear. The volume covers a variety of empirical cases, including the relationships between the expertise on radiation’s health effects and aids for a-bomb survivors in Japan; the development of films to capture nuclear tests and exposures; colonialist and imperialist contexts that dictated the legal status of Micronesia as a test site; rhetoric of “nuclear apartheid”; the constitutive roles of institutions such as the International Atomic Energy Agency and networks to monitor radioactive contamination; a conceptual shift in transnational nuclear waste management; different paradigms in global governance of nuclear hazards; implications of the influx of Western medicine for child survivors of Chernobyl; the tension and co-existence of catastrophic and optimistic visions of nuclear future; and emerging practices to memorialize Fukushima and other nuclear disasters. Chapter authors include leading scholars of nuclear history and politics such as Joseph Masco (Chicago), Kate Brown (MIT), John Krige (Georgia Tech), Angela Creager (Princeton), and Maria Rentetzi (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), and up-and-coming new researchers.

We believe that the volume contributes new insights on how we have come to where we are with nuclear technology, and this event will offer an opportunity for promising and meaningful discussion relevant to the preservation of human future — especially given the current energy crisis and the global nuclear order destabilized by Russia’s war in Ukraine.

About the Speakers:

Kyoko Sato is Associate Director of the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at Stanford University. Her research examines technoscientific governance in Japan and the United States. She is currently working on a manuscript to examine Japan’s nuclear history through the dynamics among global and national governance approaches, transnational development of expertise on radiation, and civil society mobilization. She is also part of a project that compares Covid-19 policy responses in East Asia. She has published in journals including Science, Technology and Human Values; East Asian Science, Technology and Society; Theory and Society; and Journal of Science and Technology Studies (in Japanese) and book chapters on the Fukushima disaster in English and Japanese.

Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, philosopher and historian of science is emeritus professor at Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne University. She is a member of the French Academy of Technology and of several ethics committees. She was the 2021 Sarton Medalist of the History of Science Society and the recipient of the Dexter Award for outstanding achievements in the History of Chemistry from ACS in 1994.  Her most recent publications include Temps-paysage. Pour une écologie des crises (2021) and Between Nature and Society. Biographies of Materials (2022).

Soraya Boudia is an STS scholar and professor of sociology at the Université Paris Cité. Her research focuses on the relationship between science and politics in the global environmental issues. She has extensively worked on the history of nuclear risks and toxicants governance. She has published with N. Jas, Powerless Science? Science and Politics in a Toxic World (Berghann, 2014), and with A. N. H. Creager, S. Frickel, E. Henry, N. Jas, C. Reinhardt, J. A. Roberts, Residues, Rethinking Chemical Environment (Rutgers University Press, 2021). She is currently co-leading a national French research initiative on risk and crisis initiative on risk and crisis.

About the Discussants:

David Holloway is the Raymond A. Spruance Professor of International History, a professor of political science, and an FSI senior fellow. He was co-director of CISAC from 1991 to 1997, and director of FSI from 1998 to 2003. His research focuses on the international history of nuclear weapons, on science and technology in the Soviet Union, and on the relationship between international history and international relations theory. His book Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy, 1939-1956 (Yale University Press, 1994) was chosen by the New York Times Book Review as one of the 11 best books of 1994, and it won the Vucinich and Shulman prizes of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies. It has been translated into seven languages, most recently into Chinese. The Chinese translation is due to be published later in 2018. Holloway also wrote The Soviet Union and the Arms Race (1983) and co-authored The Reagan Strategic Defense Initiative: Technical, Political and Arms Control Assessment (1984). He has contributed to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Foreign Affairs, and other scholarly journals.

Dan Zimmer completed his Ph.D. from the Department of Government at Cornell University. His research focuses on the implications that anthropogenic existential risk (x-risk) poses for some of the foundational categories of Western political thought, paying particular attention to the historical dimension of ongoing engagement and avoidance with the subject. His doctoral dissertation examined how the political debates inspired by the thermonuclear fallout crisis of the 1950s came to be reformulated in light of the growing public preoccupation with ecological x-risks such as global warming and nuclear winter beginning in the 1980s. His research at Stanford seeks to bring this historical analysis up to the present by tracking how the contemporary study of x-risk came to be formalized in the early 2000s in response to growing concerns about the prospect of machine superintelligence. Previously, Dan spent a year as a Boren Fellow studying the tactics used by the Gezi Park protestors in Istanbul, Turkey.

 

 All CISAC events are scheduled using the Pacific Time Zone.

William J. Perry Conference Room

Kyoko Sato
Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent
Soraya Boudia
David Holloway
Dan Zimmer
Seminars
-
Christian Breunig

How much and in what form do politicians accept economic inequality? The talk explores the attenuated response of governments to rising economic inequality in Europe and North America. Political interventions in the economy depend on how elected representatives learn and reason about various forms of inequality and, ultimately, and how they decide when political action is required. Regardless of actual changes in inequality, legislators with leftist identity perceive inequality as rising and unfair, while rightist politicians hold the opposite views. When legislators then think about public demand for redistribution, they rely on their own redistributive preferences as a heuristic: the more supportive politicians are about redistribution, the higher their estimation of support for redistributive policies. Politicians thereby display a false consensus effect in their assessment.

Surveys and interviews with over 800 politicians in five democracies—Belgium, Canada, Germany, Netherlands, and Switzerland—elicit politicians' perceptions of economic inequality, their redistributive preferences as well as their estimates of public support among citizens. Politicians belonging to conservative parties perceive inequality to be smaller than those on the left. They also attribute less unfairness to inequality. Similarly, politicians who strongly oppose a redistributive policy do not believe that a majority of citizens favor it; however, when politicians are supportive of the measure by themselves, they believe that over 60% of citizens prefer a redistributive policy. These perceptions have behavioral consequences: legislators who believe that inequality is rising and unfair raise this issue in their parliamentary speeches. The talk probes into the intentions of elected representatives when dealing with economic inequality, unequal representation and economic policymaking in European democracies.


Christian Breunig is Professor of Comparative Politics at the Department of Politics & Public Administration at the University of Konstanz. Before coming to Konstanz, he was associate professor in political science at the University of Toronto and held a post-doc position at the Max-Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in Cologne, Germany. He received my doctorate in the Department of Political Science at the University of Washington in Seattle. His research concentrates on representation and public policy in advanced democracies and has been published in the leading journals of political science. He is a PI at the Cluster of Excellence “The Politics of Inequality" and directs the German Policy Agendas project which is part of the Comparative Agendas Project. In 2022-23, he is fellow at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioural Sciences.

*If you need any disability-related accommodation, please contact Shannon Johnson at sj1874@stanford.edu. Requests should be made by April 20, 2023.

Anna Grzymała-Busse

Encina Hall 2nd floor, William J. Perry Conference Room

Christian Breunig, University of Konstanz
Seminars
-
talia stroud photo with text winter seminar series

Join the Cyber Policy Center, together with the Program on Democracy and the Internet on Tuesday, February 28, from Noon–1 PM Pacific, for Cross-Partisan Interaction in Online Discussion Groups, a discussion with Talia StroudThe session will moderated by Nate Persily, Co-Director of the CPC and James B. McClatchy Professor of Law at Stanford Law School.

Levels of polarization in the United States have increased, leading some to worry about the future of productive cross-partisan interactions that are critical for democracy. This concern is based on whether people have the opportunity to interact with those who do not share their views and whether, if given the opportunity, the outcomes are positive. Two streams of research provide hope. First, cross-partisan interactions happen in non-political spaces, such as online discussion groups. Second, intergroup contact theory proposes that interactions between opposing groups can reduce prejudice, particularly when group members bond over shared identities. Yet, whether and when cross-partisan exposure in online discussion groups results in depolarization requires additional research. This talk will share the results of a three-week long study of cross-partisan parents on Reddit (n = 323) who were randomly assigned to subreddits that focused on one of three topics: (1) politics, (2) parenting, or (3) parenting with some politics inserted nearly two weeks into the study period. Findings indicate that the addition of political commentary into the parenting group resulted in more negative group experiences, suggesting limitations on the hopes that cross-partisan interaction in non-political online spaces can generate more favorable attitudes toward the political opposition. We extend these findings by analyzing Reddit data to see what happens when politics comes up in parenting subreddits.

This session is part of the Winter Seminar Series, a series spanning January through March, hosted at the Cyber Policy Center with the Program on Democracy and the Internet. Sessions are in-person and virtual, with in-person attendance offered to Stanford affiliates only. Lunch is provided for in-person attendance.

In person attendance is available to Stanford affiliates and virtual attendance via zoom is open to the public; registration is required.

About the Speaker

Natalie (Talia) Jomini Stroud, Ph.D., is the E. M. "Ted" Dealey Professor of the Business of Journalism and is a Professor in the Department of Communication Studies and the School of Journalism and Media, as well as the founding and current Director of the Center for Media Engagement (mediaengagement.org) in the Moody College of Communication at The University of Texas at Austin. She helped to found New _Public, an organization working to improve digital public space and she serves as one of the academic research co-leads on the U.S. 2020 Facebook & Instagram Election Study. Stroud’s research on the media’s role in a democracy has received numerous national and international awards, including the International Communication Association (ICA)'s prestigious Outstanding Book Award for her book Niche News: The Politics of News Choice, and the inaugural Journalism Studies Public Engagement Award.

Nathaniel Persily
Talia Stroud
Seminars
-
headshot of marie-elisabeth pate-cornell on cardinal background

Join the Cyber Policy Center, together with the Program on Democracy and the Internet on Tuesday, February 14, from Noon–1 PM Pacific, for a discussion with Dr. Marie-Elisabeth Paté-Cornell. The session will moderated by Andrew Grotto who directs the Program on Geopolitics, Technology, and Governance.

Paté-Cornell will present a warning systems model in which early-stage cyber threat signals are generated using machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. The risk management team is hybrid: a "robot" and a human technician who can take over when the uncertainties or the consequences of failure are too large. Active cyber security is most often, in practice, reactive. Based on the manual forensics of machine-generated data by humans, security efforts only begin after a loss has taken place but the current security paradigm can be significantly improved. Cyber-threat behaviors can be modeled as a set of discrete, observable steps called a ‘kill chain.’ Data produced from observing early kill-chain steps can support the automation of manual defensive responses before an attack causes losses. Using the concept of  a system gate set, a model of access control decisions, cyber security experts can effectively conduct risk assessments of their systems, which can inform effective policies. This approach unifies core concepts from decision analysis and machine learning by combining machine learning and decision risk attitudes. An early warning system using these techniques has the potential to avoid more sever downstream consequences as it can disrupt threats of an attack at the beginning of the kill chain.

This session is part of the Winter Seminar Series, a series spanning January through March, hosted at the Cyber Policy Center with the Program on Democracy and the Internet. Sessions are in-person and virtual, with in-person attendance offered to Stanford affiliates only. Lunch is provided for in-person attendance.

In person attendance is available to Stanford affiliates and virtual attendance via zoom is open to the public; registration is required.

About the Speaker

Dr. Marie-Elisabeth Paté-Cornell is the Burt and Deedee McMurtry Professor in the School of Engineering and a Senior Fellow (by courtesy) of the Stanford Freeman-Spogli Institute for International Studies. Her specialty is engineering risk analysis, with applications to complex systems (space, medical, offshore oil platforms, cyber security, etc.). Her work has been based on probabilistic and stochastic models and on Artificial Intelligence. She is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, the French Académie des Technologies, the NASA Advisory Council, and a Distinguished Visiting Scientist of the Jet Propulsion Lab. She was a member of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (2001 to 2008). She holds a BS in Mathematics and Physics, Marseille (France), an Engineering degree (Applied Math/CS) from the Institut Polytechnique de Grenoble (France), an MS in Operations Research (OR) and a PhD in Engineering-Economic Systems (EES), both from Stanford University. She is the author or coauthor of numerous publications including several Best Paper awards. She was awarded the 2002 Distinguished Achievement Award of the Society for Risk Analysis (of which she is a Fellow), the INFORMS Ramsey Medal of Decision Analysis  (2010), an Honorary PhD from the University of Strathclyde (2016), and the IEEE Ramo medal for Systems Engineering and Science in 2021. Her recent work focuses on cyber security for specific systems and spacecraft design and monitoring.

Andrew Grotto
Dr. Marie-Elisabeth Paté-Cornell
Seminars
-
Event Flyer for "Global Health Economics, China, and the Science of Healthcare Delivery in the Digital Age' with photo of Sean Sylvia

Co-sponsored by Peking University Institute for Global Health and Development, and the Asia Health Policy Program

Digitization in healthcare coupled with advances in artificial intelligence and other so-called "4th Industrial Revolution" technologies are enabling a radical shift in how healthcare is delivered. Few places are attempting to integrate these into healthcare as rapidly as China. This talk will discuss China's comparative advantage in healthcare digitization and lay out a research agenda for the economics of digital health. While these technologies bring potential to improve access to high- quality care and lower costs, unintended consequences and effects on healthcare markets are underexplored. Evidence on these issues is needed to inform policy and better harness these technologies for population health. Specific applications will be drawn from ongoing research in China and elsewhere.

Image
Sylvia, Sean 021623

Sean Sylvia is an Assistant Professor of health economics at UNC. His primary research interest is in the delivery of healthcare in China and other middle-income countries. Working with multidisciplinary teams of collaborators, he conducts large-scale population-based surveys and randomized trials to develop and test new approaches to provide healthcare to the poor and marginalized. His recent work focuses on the use of information technology to expand access to quality healthcare.

Jianan Yang
Sean Sylvia Assistant Professor of Health Economics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Seminars
-
Becca Lewis photo with winter seminar series text on dark red background

Join the Cyber Policy Center, together with the Program on Democracy and the Internet on Tuesday, February 7, from Noon–1 PM Pacific, for "Platform Drama: 'Cancel culture,' Celebrity, and Accountability on Social Media" a discussion with Becca Lewis, Stanford Graduate Fellow and PhD candidate in Communication at Stanford University. The session will moderated by Nate Persily, Co-Director of the CPC and James B. McClatchy Professor of Law at Stanford Law School.

Recent years have witnessed debates about so-called “cancel culture” and more broadly about online accountability practices. In this talk, Becca Lewis examines the issue from a new perspective, using "YouTube drama" as a case study that reflects a long line of ethical negotiations in popular media contexts. Drawing on her research conducted with Professor Angèle Christin in the Stanford Department of Communication, Lewis will outline a framework for understanding accountability practices on social media: as an ongoing “platform drama” in which creators engage in perpetual and highly visible power struggles with celebrities, audiences, legacy media, other creators, and social media platforms themselves.

This session is part of the Winter Seminar Series, a series spanning January through March, hosted at the Cyber Policy Center with the Program on Democracy and the Internet. Sessions are in-person and virtual, with in-person attendance offered to Stanford affiliates only. Lunch is provided for in-person attendance.

In person attendance is available to Stanford affiliates and virtual attendance via zoom is open to the public; registration is required.

ABOUT THE SPEAKER

Becca Lewis is a Stanford Graduate Fellow and PhD candidate in Communication at Stanford University. She is an expert on disinformation and far-right digital media, and her white papers published with Data & Society are considered foundational studies in the field. Her research has also been published in academic journals including New Media & Society, Social Media + Society, and American Behavioral Scientist. In 2022, she served as an expert witness in the defamation lawsuits brought against Alex Jones by parents of Sandy Hook shooting victims. She holds an MSc in Social Science from the Oxford Internet Institute.

 

Nathaniel Persily
Becca Lewis
Seminars
-

The advent of the “Arab Spring” over a decade ago fell short of addressing popular aspirations for greater economic prosperity and peace. Few of the successes in certain regions were offset by substantial detriments in countries that witnessed conflicts, civil wars, macroeconomic impairments, and socio-economic declines.

This talk will map out the major macroeconomic indices and indicators in the Arab Spring states, before and after the mobilization, in an attempt to shed a comparative light on the repercussions of the Arab Spring. Such indices include those of regulatory environment, competitiveness, corruption, human development, human capital, knowledge and innovation, entrepreneurship, research and development, public finance, financial inclusion, and e-government. The presentation will also highlight major challenges that have confronted the Arab Spring states and other embroiled Arab countries, namely: economic development and growth, fiscal deficits and sovereign-debt sustainability, unemployment, displaced populations, financial exclusion, weak safety-net programs, and informal economy. Finally, based on the events of the last decade, the talk will outline lessons learned regarding participatory democracy and good governance, social equity, independent development, civilizational renewal, and modernizing and institutionalizing the public sectors.

ABOUT THE SPEAKER

Image
Raed Charafeddine

Raed H. Charafeddine was first vice-governor at Banque du Liban, Lebanon’s central bank, from April 2009 till March 2019 and served as alternate Governor for Lebanon at the International Monetary Fund. He is currently a partner and executive board director of Vita F&B Capital, a MEA-focused strategic advisory firm. Charafeddine served as a board member and advisor for several NGOs that focus on alleviating poverty, improving education, healthcare, social justice, and women's empowerment. He was also a volunteer consultant for the United Nations Development Program in Beirut on conflict transformation. He holds a BA and an MBA from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

Encina Ground Floor Conference Room E008
Encina Hall, Ground Floor, East Wing 
616 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305

Raed Charafeddine
Seminars
Subscribe to Seminars