Health policy
-
Joe Selby

Joe Selby was a founding executive director of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Much of his research has focused on diabetes outcomes and quality improvement, as well as primary care delivery, colorectal cancer screening strategies, and disparities in diabetes mellitus treatment effectiveness. 

 

 

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email. For Zoom participants, the link will be in the confirmation email. 

Registration

Hybrid Seminar: Lunch will be provided for on-campus participants.
Please register if you plan to attend, both for in-person and via Zoom.

Log in on your computer, or join us in person:
Encina Commons, Room 119
615 Crothers Way
Stanford, CA 94305

Seminars
-
Katie Attwell

 

Katie Attwell is an associate professor with the University of Western Australia School of Social Sciences. Katie specializes in mandatory vaccination policy in Europe, Australia, and the US, focusing on the tactics governments use to motivate people to get vaccinated and how policies are designed. 

Mark Navin

 

Mark Navin is a professor and chair of philosophy at Oakland University (Rochester, MI) and Clinical Ethicist at Corewell Health. His research is primarily in clinical ethics and ethics in public health.  

 

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email. For Zoom participants, the link will be in the confirmation email. 

Registration

Hybrid Seminar: Lunch will be provided for on-campus participants.
Please register if you plan to attend, both for in-person and via Zoom.

Log in on your computer, or join us in person:
Encina Commons, Room 119
615 Crothers Way
Stanford, CA 94305

Seminars
-
Image
Laura_Carstensen

Laura Carstensen is a professor of psychology at Stanford, where she's the founding director of the Stanford Center on Longevity. Her research focuses on ways in which motivational changes influence emotional experience and cognitive processing. 

-

Abstract: Along virtually any dimension, older people report better emotional well-being than younger generations. Considering the many losses older people experience, these findings are referred to as “the paradox of aging.” Socioemotional selectivity theory offers an account based on motivational shifts associated with perceived time horizons. This talk will overview the theory and evidence generated by tests of related hypotheses. 

 

 

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email. For Zoom participants, the link will be in the confirmation email. 

Registration

Hybrid Seminar: Lunch will be provided for on-campus participants.
Please register if you plan to attend, both for in-person and via Zoom.

Log in on your computer, or join us in person:
Encina Commons, Room 119
615 Crothers Way
Stanford, CA 94305

Seminars
-
Image
ssinger

Talk Title: What Makes Care Integration So Hard and What To Do About It

Care integration remains a seemingly intractable challenge in health care. In this seminar, we’ll examine why, probing deeper for explanations than simply that care is badly fragmented (which it is), so hard to integrate. By considering findings across multiple studies, methods, and theories, we will derive insights and explore promising solutions.

Sara Singer is a Primary Care and Population Health professor at Stanford. Her research focuses on ensuring patient safety, integrating services and service providers, implementing technological innovations that enhance the value of health care, and determining how policymakers can make changes to ensure higher-quality, more affordable healthcare. 

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email. For Zoom participants, the link will be in the confirmation email. 

Registration

Hybrid Seminar: Lunch will be provided for on-campus participants.
Please register if you plan to attend, both for in-person and via Zoom.

Log in on your computer, or join us in person:
Encina Commons, Room 119
615 Crothers Way
Stanford, CA 94305

Seminars
-
Image
Laura Hatfield

Laura Hatfield is an associate professor of health care policy (biostatistics) at Harvard. She is currently working to improve methods for control group selection in observational health services and outcomes research, and her research focuses on developing statistical methods that incorporate multiple information sources and loss functions to improve decision making. 

 

 

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email. For Zoom participants, the link will be in the confirmation email. 

Registration

Hybrid Seminar: Lunch will be provided for on-campus participants.
Please register if you plan to attend, both for in-person and via Zoom.

Log in on your computer, or join us in person:
Encina Commons, Room 119
615 Crothers Way
Stanford, CA 94305

Seminars
Authors
Michelle Mello
News Type
Commentary
Date
Paragraphs

The authority of states and localities to require vaccination is a bedrock principle of public health law. Since 1905, when the US Supreme Court upheld compulsory smallpox inoculations, there has been sustained judicial consensus that the Constitution “does not import an absolute right to be…wholly freed from restraint.” Otherwise, “organized society could not exist with safety to its members.” Until recently, objections to mandatory vaccinations were confined to a small minority of US residents. However, civic values eroded during the COVID-19 pandemic, creating a groundswell of resistance. With state legislatures now sharply limiting public health authority and a bevy of legal challenges mounted vaccination mandates—an old and highly effective public health tool—face legal uncertainty that only a few years ago seemed inconceivable.

Read Full Viewpoint

Read More

Health Affairs Podcasts Square
News

Rebalancing Public Health Powers and Individual Liberty in the Age Of COVID

Stanford's Michelle Mello and her colleague Lawrence O. Gostin at Georgetown University analyze the strains that public health emergency powers underwent during the pandemic, then propose reforms to modernize public health law. Mello then discusses the issue with Health Affairs' Editor-in-Chief Alan Weil for his "Health Podyssey" podcast.
Rebalancing Public Health Powers and Individual Liberty in the Age Of COVID
Michelle Mello and Neel Guha
Commentary

ChatGPT and Physicians’ Malpractice Risk

In this JAMA Forum perspective, SHP's Michelle Mello, professor of health policy and of law, and Neel Guha, a Stanford Law School student and PhD candidate in computer science, write that medical advice from AI chatbots is not yet highly accurate, so physicians should only use these systems to supplement more traditional forms of medical guidance.
ChatGPT and Physicians’ Malpractice Risk
Medical Mystery-Getty
Commentary

I Worried the COVID Vaccine Gave My Husband a Stroke. It Took a Year to Find the Truth

In this commentary in the San Francisco Chronicle, Stanford Health Policy's Michelle Mello — professor of health policy and professor of law — shares her personal account of the year-long struggle to diagnose her husband's autoimmune disease.
I Worried the COVID Vaccine Gave My Husband a Stroke. It Took a Year to Find the Truth
Hero Image
COVID vaccines
Unsplash/Brano
All News button
1
Subtitle

Michelle Mello and colleagues write in this JAMA Network Viewpoint that civic values were eroded during the COVID-19 pandemic, creating a groundswell of resistance to vaccines that have been a bedrock principle of U.S. public health policy.

-

 

Image
test

David Rehkopf is a social epidemiologist and Associate Professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, as well as the Department of Medicine in the Division of Primary Care and Population Health. His research focuses on understanding the health implications of the decisions that are made by the government, and his work focuses on using the implications of heath inequities to push for new strategies that promote health and well being.  

 

 

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

Registration

Hybrid Seminar: Lunch will be provided for on-campus participants.
Please register if you plan to attend, both for in-person and via Zoom.

Log in on your computer, or join us in person:
Encina Commons, Room 119
615 Crothers Way
Stanford, CA 94305

Seminars
Authors
Nora Sulots
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

Please join us in congratulating Didi Kuo, Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies (FS), and co-author Andrew S. Kelly, Assistant Professor in the Department of Health Sciences at California State University, East Bay, on being awarded the 2023 Leonard S. Robins Award for the Best Paper on Health Politics and Policy by the American Political Science Association (APSA)!

The Robins Award is named in honor of Leonard S. Robins, who, through his presence and gentle questioning at virtually every health politics panel, graciously nurtured the scholarship of both junior and senior scholars. The award recognizes the best paper on any subject that fits under the rubric of Health Politics and Policy presented at the previous annual APSA meeting.

Kuo and Kelly's award-winning paper, "State Capacity and Public Health: California and COVID-19," investigates the comparative COVID-19 policy response across counties and regions within California. In the description of the 2022 APSA panel "The Politics of Pandemic Response and the Opportunities for Health Policy Reform," during which they presented their paper, it notes that "In moving beyond a consideration of formal state and public health capacity, Kuo and Kelly argue that the more robust policy response of the Bay Area was, in part, a product of partnerships between state and community-based actors. Drawing on the concept of 'embedded autonomy,' Kuo and Kelly reconceptualize public health capacity and consider it within broader issues of state capacity and democracy."

An abstract of the paper can be found below:
 

On March 17, 2020, six counties in the Bay Area jointly issued the nation’s first shelter-in-place orders in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Cities and states across the United States quickly followed suit, with varying degrees of success. Public health officials have been critical in setting policies, enforcing behavioral and non-pharmaceutical interventions, and communicating with the public. This paper explores the determinants of public health capacity, distinguishing between formal institutional capacity (ie budget, staff) and informal embedded capacity (ie community ties, insulation from political pressures). It argues that informal embedded capacity is critical to public health capacity, but difficult to measure empirically. It concludes by relating public health capacity to broader issues of state capacity and democracy.

Read More

Didi Kuo, FSI Center Fellow
News

Didi Kuo, Expert on Comparative and American Politics, Announced as FSI’s Newest Center Fellow

As a Center Fellow, Kuo will continue to advance her research agenda at the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law, exploring both the challenges facing American democracy today and their roots.
Didi Kuo, Expert on Comparative and American Politics, Announced as FSI’s Newest Center Fellow
Hero Image
Didi Kuo and Andrew S. Kelly with APSA logo
All News button
1
Subtitle

The award recognizes Kuo and Kelly's paper, “State Capacity and Public Health: California and COVID-19,” as the best paper on health politics and policy presented at the 2022 American Political Science Association (APSA) conference.

-
Anna Grummon, Stanford Pediatrics

Anna H. Grummon is an assistant professor in the Department of Pediatrics at the Stanford School of Medicine. She is a behavioral scientist whose work seeks to identify and evaluate policies that encourage healthy eating and help us live long, healthy lives. In her work, Grummon uses randomized trials, quasi-experiments, and simulation modeling to examine how food policies like warning labels, beverage taxes, and food assistance programs affect what we eat and how healthy we are. She also studies strategies for encouraging people to choose foods that are more environmentally sustainable. Grummon holds a PhD and MSPH in Health Behavior from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and a BA with Honors in Human Biology from Stanford. She completed her postdoctoral training at Harvard.

Talk Title: Improving Diet Through Food Policy

Abstract: Unhealthy diet is a leading cause of death in the US. Policy changes could improve diet and help prevent the 500,000 deaths attributable to unhealthy diet in the US each year. This talk will provide evidence about the potential for three policies to improve diet: warning labels for sugary drinks, mandatory calorie disclosures on restaurant menus, and minimum price laws for sugary drinks. Using data from randomized controlled trials, quasi-experiments, and simulation models, we examine how these policies are likely to affect consumer behavior, the food supply, and population health outcomes like obesity.   

 

 

 

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

Registration

Hybrid Seminar: Lunch will be provided for on-campus participants.
Please register if you plan to attend, both for in-person and via Zoom.

Log in on your computer, or join us in person:
Encina Commons, Room 119
615 Crothers Way
Stanford, CA 94305

Seminars
Subscribe to Health policy