Business
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

This paper empirically investigates the labor market effects of China’s 2007 VAT reform, which significantly reduced the tax cost of capital investment. Employing city-by-year variation in the reform, we demonstrate that the tax cuts increased the earnings of skilled workers and left the earnings of the unskilled workers unaffected. Moreover, we find limited impacts of the reform on employment for both skill groups. These results suggest that the tax incentives increased the relative demand for skills, thus resulting in a higher income inequality between skilled and unskilled workers.

Journal Publisher
Labour Economics
Authors
Hongbin Li
Lingsheng Meng
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

China’s college admission increased by five times between 1998 and 2009. While the college premium for young workers declined, that for senior workers increased in this period. In our general equilibrium model, a rising demand for skills (education and experience) explains both trends. A demand shock leads to an expansion in the elastic college enrollment, depressing the college premium for young workers. With an inelastic supply, experienced college graduates continue to enjoy a rising premium. Despite the low immediate premium, young individuals continue to flood into colleges because they foresee high lifetime returns. Simulations match empirical results well.

Journal Publisher
The Journal of Human Resources
Authors
Hongbin Li
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

Despite private enterprises dominating China's labour market, college-educated workers are still highly concentrated in the state sector. Using data from the Chinese College Student Survey, we find that 64 per cent of students in the sample expressed a strong preference for state sector employment. We also identify several factors associated with receiving job offers from the state sector, including being male, holding urban hukou status, being a member of the CCP, performing well on standardized tests, attending elite universities and having higher household income or high-status parental backgrounds. These findings suggest that despite China's economic transition, the private sector may still struggle to attract highly educated workers.

Journal Publisher
The China Quarterly
Authors
Hongbin Li
Lingsheng Meng
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

A country’s national income broadly depends on the quantity and quality of workers and capital. But how well these factors are managed within and between firms may be a key determinant of a country’s productivity and its GDP. Although social scientists have long studied the role of management practices in shaping business performance, their primary tool has been individual case studies. While useful for theory-building, such qualitative work is hard to scale and quantify. We present a large, scalable dataset measuring structured management practices at the business level across multiple countries. We measure practices related to performance monitoring, target-setting, and human resources. We document a set of key stylized facts, which we label “the international empirics of management”. In all countries, firms with more structured practices tend to also have superior economic performance: they are larger in scale, are more profitable, have higher labor productivity and are more likely to export. This consistency was not obvious ex-ante, and being able to quantify these relationships is valuable. We also document significant variation in practices across and within countries, which is important in explaining differences in the wealth of nations. The positive relationship between firm size and structured management practices is stronger in countries with more open and free markets, suggesting that stronger competition may allow firms with more structured management practices to grow larger, thereby potentially raising aggregate national income.

Journal Publisher
PNAS
Authors
Hongbin Li
Authors
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

On April 1, Stanford University formally launched a new Program on Capitalism and Democracy (CAD), a collaboration between the Corporations and Society Initiative (CASI) at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) under the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies (FSI).

The program was unveiled by Jon Levin, the recently appointed incoming President of Stanford University who currently serves as Dean of the Graduate School of Business, alongside Kathryn Stoner, the Mosbacher Director of CDDRL. In his remarks, Dean Levin highlighted that CAD will "be centered exactly at the intersection of business decision-making, policymaking, and the foundations of democratic institutions." He commended the work of CASI and its founder, Anat Admati, for rigorously pursuing research on "inconvenient issues that we have often chosen to avoid or ignore" related to the role of corporations in society.

Kathryn Stoner further elaborated that "the program on Capitalism and Democracy will explore the complex interactions between democratic institutions, markets, and private sector participants." She indicated the initiative will examine a broad range of topics, noting that "sometimes corporations are causes for good and sometimes corporations may undermine the resilience and quality of democracy."

To mark the launch, CAD convened a discussion involving Professor Larry Diamond, the Mosbacher Senior Fellow in Global Democracy at FSI, Anat Admati, Professor of Finance and Economics at the GSB, and Global Witness Co-Founder Patrick Alley. Together, they focused on how the dynamics of capitalism don’t always align well with the principles of democracy. In their remarks, they addressed critical concerns such as the erosion of global democratic norms, a lack of good governance, rampant corruption, and “predatory capitalism.” They offered their insights into the challenges involved when both economic and political frameworks are of first-order importance but must be addressed in an environment of declining trust in institutions.

Admati opened by rejecting “false dichotomies” that frame the issues as stark choices between “capitalism and socialism” or “free markets and regulation.” She observed that capitalism can be thought of as “a set of markets that have institutions that are private sector based” but emphasized that “the private sector needs the government to protect its rights and to enforce its contracts. When you have markets at scale with people who don't know each other, you need institutions. You need contracts and contract enforcement.”

Larry Diamond, who has done extensive research on democratic trends and conditions around the world, brought up the paradox of the “resource curse,” the phenomenon by which developing nations with valuable natural resources often experience declines in democratic institutions as the proceeds from selling the resources get caught up in webs of corruption rather than being justly distributed for the benefit of the wider population. He claimed that “corruption and kleptocracy are at the core of underdevelopment in the world.”

Patrick Alley’s experiences at Global Witness made him very aware of corrupt politicians taking bribes from multinational oil companies. He recounted how “the politician takes money, and now their allegiance is inevitably shifting away from the electorate to their new money suppliers… so they'll start building a heavy mob around them, put big walls on the palace … and retreat into that. They don't want to lose the next election because this is going very nicely for them.” Alley summed up the cycle of corruption and concluded that “the democratic process is going to be screwed from within -- and you end up with autocracy.”

The discussion turned to exposing the role of enablers play in the persistence of systemic corruption. Enablers of corruption are not those who directly participate in illicit activities but rather are members of a “pinstripe army” (in Alley’s parlance) composed of platoons of bankers, lawyers, and accountants in global financial centers who facilitate illicit flows of money around the world. He observed that “corruption is a global industry.”

Acknowledging that corporations can be instrumental in driving economic prosperity and innovation, Admati reflected on her experience exposing the inadequacy of laws and regulatory tools that should place limits on the “pinstripe army,” She drew a sharp distinction between the private sector as “the engine of growth and the engine of innovation” and “financialized capitalism … the capitalism that is undermining democracy, the type we want to push back against. Once democracy asserts itself properly then we will be able to get the gains of capitalism.”

Diamond closed the conference by endorsing “individual enterprise and initiative—honestly earned, transparently conducted, rule-of-law-minded, with concern for the community. It's predatory capitalism that runs amok and breaks free of transparency and democratic regulation, that threatens fairness, human well-being, and democracy itself.”

CAD will be led by Prof. Anat Admati, with the support of Prof. Larry Diamond, Dr. Didi Kuo, Center Fellow at FSI, and Dr. Francis Fukuyama, Oliver Nomellini Senior Fellow at FSI.

Read More

Program on Capitalism and Democracy logo on white bar over crowd of people with transparent overlay of global currencies
News

Examining the Dynamics of Corporate Power: CDDRL Launches New Program on Capitalism and Democracy

Led by Professor Anat Admati, the program explores how capitalism interacts with democratic institutions and how a better balance between them might be achieved.
Examining the Dynamics of Corporate Power: CDDRL Launches New Program on Capitalism and Democracy
Anat Admati
News

How Banking Undermines Democracy

In a recent CDDRL research seminar, Anat Admati shared findings from her research on how banking practices can undermine democracy, which are highlighted in the new and expanded edition of her book, "The Bankers’ New Clothes: What is Wrong with Banking and What to Do About It" (Princeton University Press, 2024).
How Banking Undermines Democracy
Hero Image
Larry Diamond, Patrick Alley, and Anat Admati
Patrick Alley (center) speaks on a panel with Larry Diamond (L) and Anat Admati (R) to launch the new Program on Capitalism and Democracy.
Saul Bromberger
All News button
1
Subtitle

The Corporations and Society Initiative (CASI) at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law at FSI collaborate to address democratic recession.

Paragraphs

As the Russian government seeks to improve its economic performance, it must pay greater attention to the role of technology and digitalization in stimulating the Russian economy. While digitalization presents many opportunities for the Russian economy, a few key challenges – cumbersome government regulations and an unequal playing field for foreign companies – restrict Russia's potential in digitalization. In the future, how the Russian government designs its technology and regulatory policies will likely have significant impact both on the domestic front, as well as on their international initiatives and relationships. This paper provides an overview of recent Russian digital initiatives, the regulatory barriers for U.S. technological companies in Russia, and the intellectual property challenges for doing business in Russia. This paper also discusses recent digital initiatives from China, the United States, and other countries, and discusses what such programs mean for Russia. In this context, we also discuss Chinese and U.S. efforts to shape the future of global technological standards, alongside new programs from countries like Chile and Estonia, to attract foreign startup companies. Finally, this paper discusses the future challenges that the Russian government needs to address in order to improve its digital business environment. The paper concludes by providing some recommendations for designing market-friendly regulations, creating a level-playing field for foreign businesses in Russia, promoting Russian engagement with Western companies and governments, and undertaking more outreach efforts to make Russia's digital business environment more inclusive.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Conference Memos
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
The Stanford US-Russia Journal
Authors
Number
No. 1
Paragraphs

This paper aims to offer readers ways of understanding and mitigating the risks posed by the current venture capital (VC) environment in Russia, whilst introducing readers to a historically lucrative asset class in a country renowned for its intellectual capital. Amidst often biased and disparate analysis within contemporary literature, we have examined the current research on Russian VC and conducted expert interviews to present a well-rounded, yet distinct perspective on operating in the industry today. We demonstrate that after weighing the primary Russia-specific risks (governmental, legal, operating) and unique selling propositions (technical talent, established scientific initiatives, a burgeoning adoptive middle class), there are two central operational strategies investors should deploy, particularly in the lower-risk technology sector: 1) concentrate on globally-oriented Russian companies utilizing local technical talent to deliver global products, or 2) concentrate on market-leading Russian companies focusing on a particular product or service for local consumption. Despite the added challenges, we believe that if approached properly, the Russian market has substantial opportunities in venture capital for the adaptive investor.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Conference Memos
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
The Stanford US-Russia Journal
Authors
Number
No. 1
Authors
Rachel Owens
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

In a CDDRL research seminar series talk, Anat Admati — the George G.C. Parker Professor of Finance and Economics at the Stanford Graduate School of Business — shared findings from her research on how banking practices can undermine democracy. Her talk highlighted themes from the new and expanded edition of her book, The Bankers’ New Clothes: What is Wrong with Banking and What to Do About It. Coauthored with Martin Hellwig, the book’s latest edition was published this year by Princeton University Press.

Admati argues that banks use their positions of influence to exploit their symbiotic relationships with politicians, breaking and distorting rules with impunity. The powerful consensus in the policy establishment that banks cannot be allowed to fail, has afforded these banks unrestricted power, knowing that the government will do whatever it takes to keep them afloat. The outcome has been detrimental to the rule of law and the quality of democracy. 

Admati brought to focus the Financial Crisis Inquiry Report, which was formed in the wake of the 2007-2009 Global Financial Crisis. The report found that the crisis was avoidable, and attributed the failures to gaps in regulation. The same weaknesses in the system of regulation, Admati noted, persist today. 

Much of the problem is rooted in the lack of sufficient equity. Banks, in other words, are allowed to operate with large amounts of debt, rendering them quite fragile. Exacerbating the problem is that banks are heavily interconnected, and when one indebted corporation fails, it takes down others with it; the 2008 crisis is a case in point.

The problem is global, but the U.S. provides a clear example. The U.S. government is central to how banks are able to get away with operating with such little equity. With the federal government prepared to support them through various bailout practices, banks find a strong incentive to borrow beyond their means. A recent example of that trend is Silicon Valley Bank, wherein the federal government took measures to guarantee that depositors would be made whole after the bank’s failure. This safety net that the government has consistently provided has, in effect, shielded banks from the downsides of taking on unsound risks. Better regulation is needed to require more equity so that banks would be prepared to absorb losses before being bailed out.

However, the current regulations — sponsored by the Basel Committee — are so complex that banks can weaponize and exploit them, spreading misinformation to shield themselves from accountability. Lobbying groups, like the Bank Policy Institute, are among the most powerful on Capitol Hill, ensuring that regulations remain lax, and banks continue to have the opportunity to game the system.

Banks hold disproportionate power in democracies and face limited political will to hold them accountable.

View Professor Admati's presentation slides:
Download pdf

Read More

Jennifer Brick Mutrazashvili presents during CDDRL's Research Seminar on December 7, 2023.
News

The Failure of State Building in Afghanistan

Jennifer Brick Mutrazashvili argues that this failure lies in the bureaucratic legacies the country inherited from the Soviet era.
The Failure of State Building in Afghanistan
Daniel Tresisman
News

The Global Democratic Decline Revisited

Political scientist Daniel Treisman argues that claims of a global democratic decline and authoritarian backsliding are exaggerated and lack empirical evidence.
The Global Democratic Decline Revisited
Andres Uribe presents in a CDDRL research seminar on November 16, 2024.
News

Armed Groups and Democratic Processes: Insights from Colombia and Peru

In a recent CDDRL seminar, postdoctoral fellow Andres Uribe presented a multifaceted theory explaining the strategies violent groups adopt to influence democratic processes.
Armed Groups and Democratic Processes: Insights from Colombia and Peru
Hero Image
Anat Admati
Anat Admati presents her research in a CDDRL seminar on January 11, 2024.
Rachel Cody Owens
All News button
1
Subtitle

In a recent CDDRL research seminar, Anat Admati shared findings from her research on how banking practices can undermine democracy, which are highlighted in the new and expanded edition of her book, "The Bankers’ New Clothes: What is Wrong with Banking and What to Do About It" (Princeton University Press, 2024).

Date Label
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

Regional monopoly limits market reforms from improving cross-firm resource allocative efficiency, but little empirical evidence is available from developing countries. This paper provides rich evidence that regional monopoly may hinder the expansion of more productive firms, using the Chinese iron and steel sector as a case. Drawing on a comprehensive panel dataset comprising 11,136 iron and steel firms in China from 1998 to 2009, we demonstrate that market reforms in China's steel industry enhance competition at the national level, but do not effectively improve resource reallocation within provinces. Despite a decline in the market share of the top 10 largest steel enterprises from 80% to 50% between 1998 and 2009, resource reallocation only contributes to 14% of industry-level total factor productivity (TFP) growth, amounting to one-sixth of the contribution from within-firm productivity growth. Furthermore, the effects of resource reallocation within provinces are significantly lower compared to those observed between provinces, suggesting that market fragmentation or frictions hinder the expansion of more productive firms within the same province. These findings underscore the importance of eliminating regional monopoly for developing countries undergoing market reforms to enhance resource allocative efficiency.

Journal Publisher
China Economic Review
Authors
Scott Rozelle
-
2023 SU-DD Fellows
CDDRL's 2023 Strengthening Ukrainian Democracy and Development Fellows: (L to R) Halyna Yanchenko, Konstantyn Chyzhyk, Olena Kutsai, Anton Turupalov, Gulsanna Mamediieva, and Mykhailo Pavliuk. | Rod Searcey

Please join us on Monday, August 28, to meet CDDRL's six Strengthening Ukrainian Democracy and Development (SU-DD) Fellows. SU-DD is a 10-week training program for Ukrainian practitioners and policymakers. Launched in the fall of 2022, the program provides a unique opportunity for mid-career practitioners working on well-defined projects aimed at strengthening Ukrainian democracy, enhancing human development, and promoting good governance.

Meet our Ukrainian fellows and learn first-hand about what they have been working on during their time at Stanford. Hear about their respective projects, each focusing on actionable ways to support Ukraine’s recovery from Russia’s invasion, and find out more about how these practitioners and policymakers plan to launch their rebuilding efforts when they return to Ukraine in September.

This event is taking place in-person only. There will not be an online component.

AGENDA


12:30-12:35 — Introduction (Kathryn Stoner, Mosbacher Director of CDDRL)
12:35-12:55 — Olena Kutsai
1:00-1:20 — Mykhailo Pavliuk
1:25-1:45 — Gulsanna Mamediieva
1:45-2:00 — Break
2:00-2:20 — Konstantyn Chyzhyk
2:25-2:45 — Halyna Yanchenko
2:50-3:10 — Anton Turupalov


Reuben W. Hills Conference Room (Encina Hall East, 2nd floor)
616 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305

Panel Discussions
Subscribe to Business