The JCPOA was flawed, but it bought time; a new deal should aim higher
The JCPOA was flawed, but it bought time; a new deal should aim higher
Iran’s nuclear program remains a profound strategic challenge for both the United States and Israel, despite the consecutive joint aerial campaigns launched against it in June 2025 and February 2026. While these operations significantly degraded, temporarily, Tehran’s conventional military infrastructure, missile arsenals, and nuclear facilities, they failed to secure a medium to long-term resolution, due to Iran’s demonstrated capacity to rapidly reconstitute them.
In May 2026, the Trump administration attempted to resolve the impasse by negotiating an interim memorandum of understanding (MOU) intended to eventually lead to a permanent agreement with Iran. By early June 2026, the talks had stalled, with both sides reportedly hardening their positions. Iranian officials also conditioned any further progress on Israeli restraint in Lebanon and Gaza, effectively suspending the MOU track and turning Lebanon into the immediate diplomatic spoiler. At this stage, early June 2026, the conflict’s trajectory remains uncertain. Given the fluidity of events, the analysis offered here reflects the information available at the time of writing; a renewed outbreak of war cannot be ruled out, but at the same time, discussion of the MOU outline remains important.
Continue reading at hoover.org.