South Korea’s Fractured Democracy: One Year After Martial Law

South Korea’s Fractured Democracy: One Year After Martial Law

The country’s political polarization has metastasized. What can be done?
Lawmakers and members of the South Korea's main opposition Democratic Party (DP) demonstrate against the country's president at the National Assembly on December 04, 2024 in Seoul, South Korea.

This commentary first appeared in The Diplomat magazine.



In March 2025, one of the authors vividly observed hundreds of thousands of people filling downtown Seoul over President Yoon Suk-yeol’s impeachment. Reminiscent of the “candlelight protests” of 2017 but with greater intensity, these rallies began after the short-lived martial law declaration of last December, with some demanding Yoon’s immediate removal from office and others denouncing it as illegitimate. Even after the Constitutional Court’s unanimous decision to impeach him on April 4, rival protests continued through the June 3 snap elections.

Such rallies were hardly unprecedented in South Korea, given its rich history of civic engagement in politics. However, in the context of Yoon’s martial law declaration and subsequent impeachment, the protests illustrated a fragile democracy divided against itself. In fact, Yoon had justified his action as a necessary measure to remove “anti-state forces” in the face of the intensifying political fight with opposition forces, which controlled South Korea’s legislature throughout Yoon’s presidency.

Public opinion polls and election outcomes show how deeply divided the nation has been. A 2022 Pew survey found that 83 percent of South Koreans believed there were strong partisan conflicts, the highest among all 19 countries surveyed. Recent election results reflected such societal and political division. Yoon’s razor-thin 2022 victory over Lee Jae-myung and Lee’s narrow win in the 2025 snap election revealed a nation split down the middle.

In addition, mass protests, largely associated with progressives, have become common for conservatives too and spilled from plazas to online platforms. Politics has turned into “culture wars” and competing claims to be representative of “the people,” provoking moral charges and emotional responses. Polarization now cuts across gender and generational lines beyond political and ideological divisions of the past, standing alongside illiberalism and populism as a core threat to Korean democracy.

Continue reading via The Diplomat >

Sign up for APARC newsletters to receive our experts' insights >

Read More

Protesters demonstrate against the country's president as police stand guard on December 04, 2024 in Seoul, South Korea.
Commentary

Turmoil in South Korea After Brief Martial Law: Stanford’s Gi-Wook Shin Weighs In

As political chaos plays out in South Korea following President Yoon Suk Yeol's short-lived martial law attempt, Stanford sociologist Gi-Wook Shin, the director of APARC and its Korea Program, analyzes the fast-moving developments.
Turmoil in South Korea After Brief Martial Law: Stanford’s Gi-Wook Shin Weighs In
Anti-Yoon Suk Yeol protesters participate in a rally against impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol in Seoul, South Korea.
Q&As

Interview: Gi-Wook Shin on South Korea's Political and Institutional Crisis

The martial law episode — and all that followed — “reflects a broader global pattern of democratic erosion but also showcases Korea’s unique strengths," Stanford sociologist Gi-Wook Shin says in an interview with The Diplomat magazine.
Interview: Gi-Wook Shin on South Korea's Political and Institutional Crisis
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi delivers remarks while seated in front of the Japanese flag.
Commentary

Japan's Prime Minister Takaichi: A First-Month Report Card

Stanford sociologist Kiyoteru Tsutsui, director of the Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center and the Japan Program, evaluates Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's first month in office.
Japan's Prime Minister Takaichi: A First-Month Report Card